Ann Veronica Simon and Glioblastoma

(a malignant brain cancer story)

Ann Simon, a 34 year old American woman, my love, was diagnosed with glioblastoma multiformae in early 2002.

She and I fought hard as a team, and learned many things. Her fight ended Feb 24, 2003. This page discusses her fight.

A report on Glioblastoma

This is my current best effort to describe all the things that happened to Ann and myself during our fight with Glioblastoma. It contains information about treatment, doctors, communication, and the path of the disease. As I'm not currently learning any more about GBM, it is likely to become frozen in time, with knowledge from about 2002, and treatment concepts that are the US state of the art.

A caregiver's experience of Glioblastoma

This page is an effort to highlight my experience, instead of the experience of Ann's fight. It's definitely a work in progress, and helps me think through what I've been through and where I've been.

Mailings

These are the mailings to the group list which I maintained for communicating with all our supporters.

Links
OZ Brain Tumour  I ran into this page only recently. Although based in Australia, it provides a huge amount of well organized information about brain cancer.

And, now, the 'blog' style entries that this page used to contain, with information about our fight.

February 24, 2003 We have lost. Ann is dead.

I'm not yet at the point where I can write about her final days. The cancer in her spine moved quickly and viciously, quickly effected her breathing and swallowing, and she went downhill from there very quickly.

Memorial services were held in Oakland at Chapel of the Chimes, and in Chicago. Celebrations of her life were held in Boston and Oakland.

Watch this space for further information, or call me.

February 14, 2003 Our ten days of radiation are finished, and our hopes are weakened (although not our resolve and determination). The radiation did not have the hoped for effect and melt away the tumor. It's possible that the tumor growth has stopped, however, as the scan at the end of radiation.

We are deeply scared, and trying to figure out what our next options are. We will be seeing Dr Prados again on Tuesday.

Ann's function has declined a lot in the last two weeks. At this point, she's not able to feel or move anything below about her waist. Bowel functions aren't under her control. We can't use a wheelchair, because Ann's spine needs very precise positioning (a fancy wheelchair would work, but we don't have that on line yet).

Pain management has been a bit of a struggle. Everything changed so fast, and pain got so positionally dependent that we were increasing our technology every few days. Right now we're using fentanyl patches, and oral morphine for the breakthrough pain (which really only happens during transport).

We hooked up with the Sutter Visiting Nurses' Association (VNA). Those guys are GREAT. We saved a whole trip into SF by having one of the nurses come by and describe the same thing I described to our UCSF nurses, who diagnosed "THRUSH" (radiation induced fungal infection), and got a prescription that evening.

February 1, 2003 Ann has a reading at 21 Grand in Oakland, organized by her poetry friends Alex Cory and Pamela Liu. The reading went terrifically – thanks to Sarah Lockheart (fellow DeltaPsi fraternity member) for donating the space, and everyone who helped with Ann's transport.

Watch the video

January 28, 2003 The last 6 weeks have been rather hellish. Sometime around Christmas Ann started describing that there was something in her leg and hip that wasn't quite right. She said that she had slept on her hip funny, or our bed was uncomfortable, or she had cut her foot. Sometimes that was true, but it also seemed that something was getting worse. In our regular neuro-oncology appointment in early January, we saw Dr Chang and showed her what was happening in the leg. We described it as a "sleepiness" "deadness", and "cold". Dr Chang was most worried about blood clots, which occur in about 40% of Glioblastoma patients. The venous ultrasound came back negative – no clots. We weren't terribly happy, because over the following weeks her leg kept getting worse. Finally, we saw Dr Nelson at UC Berkeley Tang Center, who we originally worked with in the diagnosis process. He's a neuro-muscular specialist, and did a detailed exam. His exam was troublesome. Whatever was happening was effecting multiple muscle groups and multiple nerve groups, and would best be accounted for by changes in the brain, especially given where Ann's tumor had eventually been. We restarted Decadron (steroids) that day, and got an immediate positive result, which was also worrisome.

A week later we had our regularly schedule brain scan. To say we were tense wouldn't even begin to describe the feeling. We were fairly sure that we'd see dramatic regrowth. Instead, the scan was "clean" – ie, stable – as the others had been. As Dr Prados said, "This is not good", as there are only a few places for the problem to be – leg, spine, brain. If it wasn't in the brain, it was likely in the spine. So we had an immediate spinal MRI that evening, and Dr Prados stayed late to give us the news.

We visited his office when most of the lights were off and only the cleaning staff was around. After taking a quick look at the scan, his response was "this is not good" again. The tumor had spread to the spine.

We are – in some ways – upbeat. Tumor progression will be hard to fight, but cancer in the spine could be treated by radiation, which worked before. We stopped the OSI-774 and Temodar, and are going back to visit Dr Larson the next day.

Ann's function is decreasing rapidly. She's just on the verge of not being able to walk, and we'll need ramp and wheelchair technologies.

September 28, 2002 Ann went in for her drug study today. She stays in the hospital for a day while they take blood quite often to judge the exact effects of the OSI-774. They do this every time they escalate doses. That floor of the UCSF hospital has been recently renovated, and although it's kind of boring, it's nice enough.

Ann's white blood counts (total WBC, and neutrophil component) were fairly low this week, which prevented her from taking the next cycle of Temodar on time. We're working to bring those values back up and get her blood healthy. There are a number of theories, such as her system continuing to fight off a virus, or maybe some general sadness and depression bringing down her health. We're doing a lot of work researching the possibilities and coming up with an effective approach.

She's also got some odd blisters on the inside of her arm. Dr Chang saw them today, and didn't quite know what to make of them. They don't seem to be infectious, but more some kind of simple dermal thing, perhaps from Ann's good luck bracelets.

September 16, 2002 Today we got the results back from the first scan we've had since Ann finished the radiation. This scan would tell us generally whether the OSI-774 and Temodar regime was having a positive effect. Boy, were we nervous. What actually transpired was that we had the scan on the morning of the 13th (a Friday) fairly early (scan started at 8am) and were done by 10am. Since we were in the area, we stopped by to talk to DR Larson. He took a moment to pull up the scan and walk us through it, and said it seemed to him to be fairly good. On Monday we saw DR Prados, who gave us the report and took us through the usual exam. We're happy enough with the treatment, are sticking with it, and escalating to the next dose level (300mg per day).

UCSF has switched to a new scan viewer version which seems to have removed the most useful feature, the ability to view two different day's scans at the same time. This is clearly a feature reduction because it's a "free" version of the software, which I don't appreciate. The new software has many new cool bells and whistles, like being able to make movies. The movies are currently AVI files that will likely run only on recent versions of Windows Media Player. Both are about a megabyte, so you may want to download them instead of simply clicking.

May 28th, 2002

September 13, 2002

July 21, 2002. Ann has been taking OSI-774 for 4 days at a dose level of 250mg/day. This is part of a phase I escalation trial concurrently with Temodar and Dilantin. The primary side effects we've been warned of are skin rashes, and diarrhea. The skin rash has shown up just a little in her face. Technically, the rash isn't a side effect, because OSI-774 interrupts Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGRF), which regulates how many cells grow. Ann will stay a night at UCSF for a bio-availability survey on July 25th.
I was a little disturbed by the process followed by the UCSF team. We agreed with DR Prados' idea of continuing Ann with Temodar since things have been working well, then adding something else to the mix. He suggested either his OSI-774 trial, or Accutane. During our meeting I forgot to get information about the positive effects of Accutane, so I called in a few days later. We were told repeatedly that information about Accutane and Temodar was unpublished, and I said repeatedly that I was looking for general information, such as what DR Prados happily provided for OSI-774 (the clinical, "high risk", choice). After a week, we felt that we weren't going to get any information on Accutane, and decided to go with the OSI-774 trial since we needed to continue on some treatment path. It just doesn't seem right that we couldn't get the information that we were legally mandated to get.
I've had a terrible flu for the last week. A number of my friends have had it too, and it's a real bitch. Ann's started to have the sore throat that goes along with it. I'm scared that she'll have the virus going while she does the Temodar, but we just have to keep her healthy during that period.
Ann had been having symptoms for quite a while, and we had seen several doctors.

April 24th, 2002 (a Wednesday) Ann had an eye appointment at the UC Berkeley Optometry school to look at her double vision problems. She was diagnosed with papelodema (high cranial pressure) and sent immediately to Alta-Bates hospital for tests. She received a CT scan that night that showed the brain tumor. It was said that there was still some leeway in the diagnosis, so we should stay at Alta Bates for a few days as they worked out a diagnosis. Our attending physicians were Neurologists, DR Heidi Shale and DR Brad Wrubel. DR Shale was on-call when we came into the emergency room, and we mostly dealt with DR Wrubel. We liked DR Wrubel a lot.
She was admitted to the hospital, and given an MRI the next day, and a biopsy the day after that. We got the biopsy results Tuesday 4/30, which showed Glioblastoma Multiformae (gbm).

We went immediately to UCSF, our local cancer center. We had to wait a week to get an appointment with Dr. Michael Prados, and saw him on 4/8. During that time, the UCSF lab confirmed the findings of the Alta-Bates lab -- Glioblastoma. The recommended treatment is radiation and chemotherapy (Temodar). We're working with Dr. Larson in the radiation oncology group for the radiation treatment. He's recommending 2 weeks of treatment, and take another MRI to see what's happening. The standard treatment is 6 weeks, then look.

Treatment (both chemo and radio) started 5/10. As of today (5/12), both are being tolerated well.

I will add all the intermediate emails I've sent out to family and friends, contact info, doctor info, as I have time.

Right now, here are the MRI scans taken on 4/28. The scans are black and white. I was getting some reflection when I took those, so if you see red/pink ghost-ish things, those are reflections of me taking the pictures. In an MRI, right and left are reversed. Otherwise, you should be able to orient yourself using obvious features - eyes, ears, etc.